Accreditation
assures that a program has met quality standards set by
the profession. To employers, graduate schools, and licensure,
certification, and registration boards, graduation from
an accredited program signifies adequate preparation for
entry into the profession. India has a robust system of
accreditation of the professional courses well recognized
by the industry within the country even though internationally
the country has not yet opened its books for accreditation
a handicap that has been preventing the Indian professionals
to practice their professions and make careers with ease.
This gap is being rectified now with the country moving
towards becoming a full signatory of the Washington Accord,
an omnibus agreement among participant nations to mutually
recons the accredited degrees of the respective member nations.
The
Accord originally signed in 1989 has been admitting new
members and India became its provisional member in the year
2007 and it has been working towards becoming a full member
by fine tuning its accreditation system and also working
with international accreditation agencies to start the process
of building a mutually compatible accreditation system within
the country.
Engineering
colleges accreditation benchmarking in India is being done
by National Board of Accreditation (NBA) of All India Council
of Technical Education. NBA’s detailed accreditation
program can be downloaded using this
link
Global
Accreditation: International accreditation of engineering
colleges is done by Accreditation Board for Engineering and
Technology (ABET)
established as the Engineers' Council for Professional Development
(ECPD)
India
joins Washington Accord: India
has been included in the Washington Accord covering the Engineering
Education as a provisional member, represented by All India
Council for Technical Education (AICTE).
The Washington Accord, signed in 1989, is an international
agreement among bodies responsible for accrediting engineering
degree programs. It recognizes the substantial equivalency
of programs accredited by those bodies and recommends that
graduates of programs accredited by any of the signatory bodies
be recognized by the other bodies as having met the academic
requirements for entry to the practice of engineering. Click
for detailed press note
The
following is the status of Washington Accord.
Washington
Accord Status Table |
| country |
Institution |
year of joining |
| Australia |
Engineers
Australia |
1989 |
| Canada |
Engineers
Canada |
1989 |
| Chinese
Taipei |
Institute of Engineering Education |
2007 |
| Hong Kong
China |
Hong Kong
Institution of Engineers |
1995 |
| Ireland |
Engineers
Ireland |
1989 |
| Japan |
Japan
Accreditation Board for Engineering Education |
2005 |
| Korea |
Accreditation
Board for Engineering Education of Korea |
2007 |
| New Zealand |
Institution
of Professional Engineers NZ |
1989 |
| Singapore |
Institution
of Engineers Singapore |
2006 |
| South
Africa |
Engineering
Council of South Africa |
1999 |
| United
Kingdom |
Engineering
Council UK |
1989 |
| United
States |
Accreditation
Board for Engineering and Technology |
1989 |
Provisional
members* |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| Germany |
German Accreditation Agency for
Study Programs in Engineering and Informatics |
| India |
National Board of Accreditation
of All India Council for Technical Education |
| Malaysia |
Board of Engineers Malaysia |
| Russia |
Russian Association for Engineering
Education |
| Sri Lanka |
Institution of Engineers Sri Lanka |
| compiled by SEAA
www.seaastandards.org from Washington Accord data 2009
www.washingtonaccord.org |
*Institutions accepted as provisional
members are potentially suitable for the purposes of the Accord.
Qualifications accredited or recognized by organizations holding
such provisional status including that of NBA-AICTE are not
recognized by the signatories and as such the courses offered
by NBA accredited institutes will not be eligible for full
benefits under the Washington Accord which include credit
transfers.
The other Accords
APEC Engineer Agreement: This
agreement has been evolving since 1999 with the support of
the 21 member Asia Pacific Economic Countries (APEC).
India is not a member of APEC. The Agreement is largely administered
between engineering bodies. The respective governments are
closely working with their engineering bodies to make the
accord work, even though many glitches remain unresolved.
Details
Sydney Accord: This one is
a dynamic one started in 2001 and it recognises substantial
equivalence in the accreditation of qualifications in engineering
technology, normally of three years duration among its signatory
nations. All the member nations joined the accord in 2001.
SYDNEY ACCORD
MEMBERS |
| Country |
Institution |
| Australia |
Engineers Australia |
| Canada |
Canadian Council of Technicians and Technologists |
| Hong Kong China |
The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers |
| Ireland |
Engineers Ireland |
| New Zealand |
Institution of Professional Engineers NZ
|
| South Africa |
Engineering Council of South Africa |
| United Kingdom |
Engineering Council UK |
| compiled by SEAA
www.seaastadards.org |
for more details
Dublin Accord: This agreement is among the
four countries including Canada, Ireland, South Africa and
United Kingdom for substantial equivalence in the accreditation
of tertiary qualifications in technician engineering, normally
of two years duration. It commenced in 2002. Two other countries,
United States and New Zealand are provisional members of the
agreement. Details
Engineers Mobility Forum:
The Institution of Engineers of India is a provisional member
of this agreement which commenced in the year 2001. The agreement
operates based on the same competence standards of the APEC
Engineer Agreement even though the Forum is open for all the
nations. The current members are Australia, Canada,Hong Kong
China, Ireland, Japan,Korea, Malaysia,New Zealand, Singapore,South
Africa,Sri Lanka,United Kingdom and United States. Including
India, the other provisional members are Chinese Taipei and
Bangladesh. Details
Engineering Technologist Mobility Forum:
The agreement was signed by participating economies/countries
in 2003. The parties to the Agreement have agreed to commence
establishing a mutual recognition scheme for engineering technologists.
The institutions and individual practitioners would mutual
recognition for practicing their profession in the member
countries.
The current list of members includes, Canada, Hong Kong China,
Ire Land, New Zealand, South Africa and United Kingdom. Details
|